1. | Assessment | The process of evaluating a student's performance through various methods, including exams, assignments, projects, and presentations. |
2. | BOE | The Board of Examinations of the University. |
3. | CoE | The Controller of Examinations of the University. |
4. | Continuous Assessment | Ongoing evaluation of a student's performance throughout the course, including quizzes, assignments, and class participation. |
5. | Course Coordinator | Course Coordinator to the course is one of the Course Instructors responsible for uniformity of Teaching and Assessment across different sections. |
6. | Course File | A document or record that details the course Design, Implementation and Outcomes of a particular course at the end of the Semester/Trimester. |
7. | Dy. CoE | The Deputy Controller of Examinations of the University. |
8. | End-term Assessment | A final evaluation conducted at the end of the academic term, typically in the form of a written exam. |
9. | Examination | A formal test of a student's knowledge or proficiency in a subject or skill, typically conducted under timed conditions. |
10. | External Examiner | An independent academic expert from outside the university who reviews and ensures the quality and fairness of the examination and assessment processes. |
11. | Lesson Plan | A plan for the course delivery which involves outlining the Objectives, Activities and Assessments for a course. |
12. | Moderation | The process of ensuring consistency and fairness in the grading of assessments by reviewing and adjusting marks or grades. |
13. | Registrar | The Registrar of the University. |
14. | SLD | Specific Learning Disability |
15. | Student | A student pursuing an academic program at DIT University. |
16. | TR | Tabular Register |
17. | Unfair Means (UFM) | Any action by a student that gives them an unfair advantage in an examination or assessment, such as cheating or plagiarism. |
18. | VC | The Vice Chancellor of the University. |
The members of the committee shall be nominated by Director/Dean/principal of the respective Schools/colleges. The tenure of the committee shall be one complete session as per the Academic Calendar of University.
The members of the committee shall be nominated by Director/Dean/principal of the respective Schools/colleges. The tenure of the committee shall be one complete session as per the Academic Calendar of University.
The Detailed Guidelines for Prevention of Unfair Means and Penalties applicable for Unfair Mean cases shall be as per the approved policy.
The members of committee shall be nominated by Vice Chancellor and the tenure of the committee shall be one complete session as per the Academic Calendar of University.
The Centre of Superintendent shall ensure the following:
Their primary duties of the invigilators include the following:
All structured courses shall have continuous evaluation and comprehensive end-term examination components.
Further, specific evaluation methods and instruments shall apply to courses with Industrial/Summer Training, Thesis, Seminars and Dissertations. Refer to the program catalog document for the details.
Further, the Question Papers for Mid-term and End-term Exams shall be framed by the Course Coordinator in consultation with all Course Instructors. While creating the question papers it shall be ensured that they are aligned with Bloom’s Taxonomy and address various cognitive levels namely viz. Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analysing, Evaluating and Creating. Also, clear grading rubrics must be provided so that there is complete transparency in marking. The question papers must also include details instructions to guide the students. These question papers shall be reviewed by the Moderation Committee of the respective departments before sending them to the CoE Office.
The schedule of assessments for Continuous Evaluation components (excluding Mid-term Exam) shall be decided by the Course Instructor/Coordinator at the beginning of the academic term as per the broad guidelines given in the Academic Calendar of the University. This schedule must be communicated to the students as part of the lesson plan shared with them on the commencement of new semester/trimester. The course coordinator/instructor shall ensure that all necessary resources and facilities are available at the time of evaluation and adequate supervision is done to maintain the integrity of the assessment process. Further, for continuous evaluation components like assignments, case studies etc. clear specific submission deadlines must be followed. The students must be apprised clearly by the Course Instructors on the penalties for late submission of assignments, projects etc. However, under special circumstances extensions may be granted.
The detailed scheduling for Mid-term and End-term Exam shall be done by the CoE office as per the dates given in the Academic Calendar. This schedule must be published well in advance on official University channels such as website, notice board and email. If any changes take place in the published schedule, it shall be ensured that a timely update is sent to all concerned students.
The graded assessments for Continuous Evaluation Components (Excluding Mid-term and End-term Exam) shall be returned to the students promptly so as to provide them with timely feedback. The students must be encouraged to review their graded work and seek clarifications, if any.
The Evaluation of answer sheets for Mid-term and End-term Examination shall be completed within a soon after the examination, the deadline for which will be announce by CoE separately. The respective Course Coordinator/Instructors. The evaluated answer sheets must be shown to the examinees to ensure fairness and transparency in the grading process. The feedback must also be shared with the students to provide them an opportunity to understand their mistakes and learn from them.
The documentation of all assessments and their grading should be maintained for future reference by the respective Course Coordinator/Instructor. These records should be included as a part of the course file submitted by the respective course coordinators at the end of each semester/trimester. Complete confidentiality shall be ensured of these records.
It refers to any action that undermines the integrity of the educational process and gives unfair academic advantage to any student. Academic Misconduct is taken seriously by the University as it violates ethical standards and undermines the value of academic credentials. The academic misconduct is broadly classified under the following two sections:
In case of any of the above actions by the students, the invigilator should immediately document the incident noting all relevant details in the proforma available with the Centre Superintendent, collect all relevant evidence for use of unfair means (if any) and shall immediately issue a new answer booklet by writing UFM across on the title page of the original booklet. Further, the invigilator must report the incident to the Centre Superintendent/Deputy Centre Superintendent/CoE/Dy. CoE. At the end of the examination, the invigilator shall submit the duly filled proforma, any evidence of Unfair Means, original booklet and new issued booklet to the Centre Superintendent for further action. All such cases will be submitted to the Unfair Means committee by the CoE office for further investigation and proceedings.
In addition to the above clauses, any other act by the student during examination which may be deemed fit for Unfair Means may also be reported by the Invigilators/Examination officials for necessary actions.
Plagiarism refers to the act of presenting someone else’s work, ideas, data, language without giving proper credit. It violates academic integrity standards and undermines the principal of honesty, fairness and originality expected in scholarly endeavours. DIT University has a strict policy in place to deter and address plagiarism. This policy includes Need and guidelines for Plagiarism check, Academic Dishonesty Policy and Penalties based on Level of Plagiarism and Composition of Institute and Departmental Integrity Panels. In addition, it is advised that the faculty members should be vigilant in identifying potential plagiarism through continuous review and also provide students with training on proper citation practices and the importance of academic integrity.
If a student becomes ill during an examination, he/she shall notify the invigilator immediately. A student may be allowed to leave the examination room temporarily for illness. However, during his absence a member of the university staff shall accompany the student. If the student desires to complete the examination, he/she will not be allowed an extension of time beyond the announced examination end time. In case of serious illness, if a student desires to discontinue writing the examination, he/she may be permitted by the invigilator after informing the Centre Superintendent to leave the examination hall. If such a case occurs the invigilator shall sign the answer booklet stating the time at which the student left.
Certain degree program (such as Architecture, Pharmacy, Nursing, Healthcare, Doctoral etc.) may require appointment of examiners from outside the university.
The process of appointing an External Examiner shall be as per the need based on the program requirements or regulatory guidelines. The criteria and process for appointment of External Examiners shall be as follows:
The University shall provide the following support and resources to the External Examiner:
After the end of the assessment conducted by the External Examiner, the Head of the Department shall conduct a performance review on the contributions made and feedback given by the External Examiner. Based on the performance review the department shall decide on the re-appointment of the External Examiner for future assessments.
All Course Coordinators/Course Instructors shall ensure that the submission of marks and grades are completed within the stipulated deadlines to ensure timely result declaration. In case of any delay due to unavoidable circumstances a request for extension may be sought from the Controller of Examination. All marks and grades must be submitted on the ERP portal as per the instructions issued by the CoE and the supporting documents such as attendance sheets etc. should also be submitted alongwith the marks. Complete confidentiality of all marks and grades must be ensured during the submission process and only authorized personnel must have access to marks and grade records.
To ensure fairness, consistency and accuracy in the University Examination all grades submitted by the Course Coordinators on the ERP Portal shall be moderated by the Moderation Committee of the respective departments. Moderation will involve reviewing and rectifying any discrepancies in the grades submitted by the Course Coordinators and also ensuring that the grading suggested is not very harsh or lenient. The Moderation Committee must also share the feedback with the course coordinators such that it may help in the improvement of future assessments. If any changes are made during the moderation process, the Moderation Committee shall document and justify these changes.
After updation of all marks and grades by the respective course coordinators, the CoE office shall compile the results ensuring accuracy. The compiled results shall be reviewed by the CoE and placed in the Board of Examination or to the Vice Chancellor for approval before result declaration. Once the results are approved, the registrar will issue a notification to students that the result have been published on the ERP portal of the University. Simultaneously the CoE will ensure that the results are available to the student on the ERP portal.
After the result declaration, students who believe that there has been an error or unfairness in their results, can submit an appeal. The process of submitting an appeal along with the deadline to submit the same will be notified by Registrar while announcing the result.
All appeals received will be examined by Grievance Redressal Committee which shall promptly and fairly address the grievances as per the University’s policy.
The CoE office shall ensure that all records are stored securely to protect against unauthorized access as per the University’s Policy. The CoE office must also implement backups and recovery procedures to prevent data loss.
DIT University is committed to provide an inclusive learning environment and equal opportunities to demonstrate academic abilities to the students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD). On the disclosure of SLD by a student to the University, an assessment shall be made to determine the specific needs and accommodations required by the student. In addition, the student with SLD shall be required to submit appropriate documentation for the verification of the disability. The concern student should submit such request at the time of admission or before the beginning of the academic session. Strict confidentiality shall be ensured of all documentation shared with the University.
The university will make all reasonable efforts to accommodate such special need of the students, which may include appropriate seating arrangement, adaptive technologies, additional time, assignment of a writer etc on a case-by-case basis.
Guidelines for Prevention of Unfair Means
Click Here